Yeah, I don't really get Hugh Jackman. 3771 and I were talking about this the other day, actually. (http://sjazzmreow.livejournal.com/32984.html?thread=92120#t92120) He just does absolutely nothing for me, and I can't percieve him in a sexual context at all. So, um, him being number one is, to me, kinda completely ludacris.
Alas, no Gyllenhaal! And I can asure you that I would never through things at him if he were. He's a dear. While he is massively more appealing than a lot of the other chaps that did make it onto the list, I can sort of see why he wasn't there. He's not really as well known as the others, and certainly not as well known for heart-throb status. Mostly I was just hugely pleased by how many old school actors from the fifties made it on - Brando, James Dean, Paul Neuman. That was more than I expected from channel nine, lord of the lowest common denominator broadcasting.
no subject
Alas, no Gyllenhaal! And I can asure you that I would never through things at him if he were. He's a dear.
While he is massively more appealing than a lot of the other chaps that did make it onto the list, I can sort of see why he wasn't there. He's not really as well known as the others, and certainly not as well known for heart-throb status. Mostly I was just hugely pleased by how many old school actors from the fifties made it on - Brando, James Dean, Paul Neuman. That was more than I expected from channel nine, lord of the lowest common denominator broadcasting.