ext_97147 ([identity profile] 3771.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] heystasa 2009-05-05 02:48 pm (UTC)

did... did you not see the muscles? i'm not sure how you could've missed them, but apparently you did. because um, they're... they're pretty persuasive, as far as i'm concerned. they make some salient points. about hugh. and his muscles. yes.

i mean, i guess it sort of makes sense, really. he is just such a Nice Guy, i can understand it getting in the way of everything else, but that's a lot of why i love him. some people are seductively attractive (http://www.gimpusers.de/dl/AngelinaJolie.jpg), some people are suavely attractive (http://www.nerve.com/CS/blogs/theremoteisland/2009/03/george_clooney_1%5B1%5D.jpg), some people are mickey (http://3771.livejournal.com/tag/on+your+knees+to+the+king), some are tex (http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2007/04/30/Tex2_narrowweb__300x488,0.jpg), and some people are just goddamn nice (http://static.open.salon.com/files/hugh_jackman1226353405.jpg). in the words of so many women throughout the ages, he's the sort of guy you can bring home to mother. he looks like a cuddler, you know? and when he gets his softcore-porn-outdoor-shower on, it's just sort of a bonus. it's like when that really cute girl you dig for being cute but mainly for being funny and cool to hang out with suddenly reveals she likes sexy underwear.

i could go on, but i shan't, because you made fun of my taste in guys :(

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting